Adopt a complete outcome model
Clavinci ships collectors, session economics, attribution, disputes, metrics, governed views, operational triggers, and health evidence as one product.
Alternative guides
Choose Clavinci when you need normalized local session and cache economics, actual and API-equivalent cost, contestable attribution, survived-code ROI, a fixed cross-pillar AI quality model, structural content exclusions, engineer-visible access audit, and collection-health evidence. Choose Faros when you need an enterprise engineering data platform with any-source ingestion, custom metrics and dashboards, AI root-cause analysis, surveys, catalogs, roadmap and capacity forecasting, software capitalization, agent context, workflow automation, and SaaS, hybrid, or on-premise deployment.
Sources checked: 2026-07-16
01 / switch case
Clavinci ships collectors, session economics, attribution, disputes, metrics, governed views, operational triggers, and health evidence as one product.
Actual and API-equivalent cost reaches issues, story points, CI, incidents, and merged lines that remain after 30 days.
Time, file, trailer, and Jira signals are versioned and recomputable, with engineer disputes and admin resolution.
Re-roll, acceptance, prompt complexity, tool-task fit, churn, compaction, delivery, and incidents share one metadata-only graph.
Individual reads are visible to the engineer and governed by reporting lines, reasons, privacy floors, peer restrictions, and anti-metrics.
Collector coverage, freshness, silent users, parser failures, rate limits, crashes, and integration health are visible before a decision.
02 / honest constraint
Faros is the stronger choice for unified modeling, any-source ingestion, custom metrics, dashboards, natural-language queries, and workflow automation.
Initiatives, capacity, dependencies, budgets, roadmap risk, investment strategy, and capitalization extend well beyond Clavinci's scope.
Service and organization catalogs, ownership, IDP integration, robust RBAC, and SaaS, hybrid, or on-premise options serve complex enterprises.
Faros provides DevEx surveys, benchmarks, root-cause analysis, human-versus-AI code analysis, recommendations, and wide executive reporting.
Faros can use past pull requests, tickets, and architectural decisions to prepare agent context, which Clavinci's content boundary intentionally excludes.
03 / readiness
Review the product model and commercial fit before treating Clavinci as a replacement.
The buyer wants a productized session-to-durable-outcome and governance model more than a customizable enterprise data and automation platform.
Faros custom metrics, dashboards, data models, automations, catalogs, surveys, forecasts, capitalization, and agent-context workflows have been inventoried.
Clavinci's supported AI, git, Jira, CI, pull request, deployment, and incident sources cover the intended decision without custom ingestion.
The fixed content exclusion and engineer-visible access model is accepted by engineering, leadership, security, legal, and workforce governance.
Clavinci's company-operated hosted model passes residency, retention, subprocessors, security, procurement, and data-processing review.
A parallel validation period will reconcile token cost, attribution, DORA, sprint, review, incident, quality, and coverage results.
04 / boundaries
AI usage and cost analysis, durable outcome attribution, DORA, Jira and sprint flow, PR and review health, stability and incidents, AI quality, governed manager views, operational alerts, and collection-health monitoring where Clavinci's supported sources cover the decision.
Faros unified data modeling, custom and on-premise ingestion, custom metrics and dashboards, natural-language analysis, workflow automation, catalogs, surveys, benchmarks, roadmap and capacity forecasting, capitalization, agent context, or hybrid and on-premise deployment.
No importer for Faros schemas, custom sources, dashboards, metrics, automations, catalogs, surveys, forecasts, capitalization, AI conversations, or historical classifications is promised. Preserve required exports and validate both systems before cutover.
Sources checked: 2026-07-16